Kumamap
登入

熊野古道の巡礼 — クマの危険はどれくらい現実的か？

CaminoWalker 2個月前 此帖子已自動翻譯。
0 瀏覽
熊野古道の巡礼 — クマの危険はどれくらい現実的か？ - 帖子圖片 1

4月に中辺路を歩く予定です。5日間で田辺から那智まで。伊勢路で誰かが襲われたと聞いて動揺しています。

ヨーロッパから来るので、クマの経験は全くありません。山道は森林に覆われ、携帯はほとんど繋がりません。何かあれば助けは遠いです。

質問:

  • 中辺路での目撃はどのくらい頻繁ですか？
  • 巡礼の歩行にベアスプレーを携帯すべきでしょうか？
  • 伊勢路は明らかにもっと危険ですか？

留言 (1)

0/2000

Kumamap Team 2個月前

Wakayama has 15 total tracked incidents on Kumamap. Mie has 183. Compare that to Akita (20,807) or Hokkaido (12,455). The Kii Peninsula is one of the lowest-risk bear areas on Honshu.

The Nakahechi sees heavy pilgrim traffic, especially in spring. Bear encounters on it are very rare. Many reported "sightings" on the Kumano Kodo are actually wild monkeys or boar, which are common in the area.

The Iseji is longer, less trafficked, more remote terrain. Different risk profile than the Nakahechi.

For the Nakahechi in April:

  • Bear spray is probably overkill. A bell is a reasonable precaution.
  • The trail passes through villages and guesthouses regularly. You're never truly remote for long stretches.
  • April has 2,580 incidents nationally, moderate activity as bears emerge from hibernation.
  • Monkeys and wild boar are your more likely encounters. Don't leave food unattended.

Wakayama data: kumamap.com/en/areas/wakayama

返回社群